What is Service Quality?

Service quality refers to the extent to which a service meets or exceeds customer expectations, ultimately shaping their satisfaction and loyalty. Unlike products, services are intangible and often personalized, making quality more challenging to measure and manage. Service quality encompasses a range of factors, from the physical environment and reliability to staff responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. Service quality is crucial in fields like libraries, healthcare, hospitality, and retail, as it directly influences customer experiences and their overall perception of value. Organizations can create more positive, meaningful interactions, foster trust, and build long-term customer relationships by assessing and improving service quality.

Why Service Quality is Essential for Customer Satisfaction

Service quality is vital in shaping customer satisfaction, as it directly influences how customers perceive their interactions with an organization. Unlike products, services are often intangible and personal, meaning that customer satisfaction relies heavily on the quality of service provided. When service quality is high, customers feel valued, respected, and more likely to return, fostering loyalty and a positive brand reputation. Here’s an in-depth look at why service quality is essential for customer satisfaction.

Building Trust and Reliability: High-quality service builds trust and reliability. When customers know they can consistently depend on an organization to deliver what it promises, they develop confidence in its reliability. For example, in a library setting, customers who experience prompt assistance, accurate information, and accessible resources are more likely to trust the library’s services and return. Consistency in service delivery builds trust, which is essential for fostering a long-term relationship with customers. When customers trust an organization, they feel more satisfied and secure in their decision to engage with it, making them less likely to switch to competitors.
Meeting and Exceeding Customer Expectations: Customers have expectations when they engage with any service, from the quality of interactions to the efficiency of service delivery. When service quality aligns with or surpasses these expectations, customers feel satisfied, valued, and appreciated. Meeting expectations assures customers that they made the right choice while exceeding them creates a memorable experience that leaves a positive impression. This “wow factor” not only boosts satisfaction but can turn customers into loyal advocates who are eager to share their positive experiences with others. Organizations focusing on delivering high service quality can continuously meet or exceed customer expectations, enhancing customer satisfaction and loyalty.
Improving Customer Retention: Satisfied customers are more likely to return and engage with an organization repeatedly, making customer retention a key benefit of high service quality. High service quality encourages customers to stay loyal to the brand, as they feel valued and trust the organization to meet their needs consistently. Additionally, retaining existing customers is often more cost-effective than acquiring new ones. Satisfied customers are not only more likely to return but also more likely to make additional purchases or engage more deeply with the brand, which contributes to sustainable growth. By investing in service quality, organizations foster long-term relationships supporting customer retention and loyalty.
Enhancing Word-of-Mouth and Reputation: Customers who experience high-quality service are more likely to share their positive experiences with friends, family, and social networks, leading to positive word-of-mouth. This natural form of promotion reinforces the organization’s reputation and can significantly impact customer acquisition. Satisfied customers who promote the brand voluntarily become powerful advocates, attracting new customers through their recommendations. Additionally, a reputation for high service quality strengthens the organization’s image, positioning it as a trustworthy and preferred option in its market. Positive word-of-mouth can be a valuable asset in competitive markets where customer satisfaction and loyalty drive brand success.
Creating Positive Emotional Connections: High service quality often involves personalized attention, empathy, and responsiveness, which foster a sense of value and respect. When customers feel genuinely cared for and understood, it strengthens their emotional connection to the organization. These positive interactions leave customers with a sense of satisfaction that goes beyond the functional aspects of the service. For instance, a friendly librarian who takes the time to recommend books tailored to a patron’s preferences creates a positive experience that patrons will remember. This emotional satisfaction deepens loyalty, as customers associate the organization with positive, meaningful experiences.
Reducing Service Recovery Efforts and Costs: Delivering high service quality reduces the likelihood of errors, complaints, or service issues, which in turn minimizes the need for service recovery efforts. Organizations experience fewer service disruptions, complaints, and costly recovery processes by consistently meeting or exceeding customer expectations. Moreover, when organizations deliver high service quality, customers tend to be more forgiving if an occasional issue arises, as they trust the organization’s commitment to excellence. High service quality helps create a resilient customer base that values the brand even during minor challenges, further reinforcing satisfaction and loyalty.
Encouraging Brand Advocacy and Community Engagement: Satisfied customers who experience high-quality service often become brand advocates who recommend the organization to others, both online and offline. This advocacy builds trust among potential new customers and strengthens the organization’s market presence. Additionally, organizations with high service quality often build a community of loyal customers who are engaged with the brand. These customers actively participate in events, engage on social media, and contribute to the brand’s reputation. When customers feel like part of a community, they are more likely to be loyal and enthusiastic about the brand, driving satisfaction and fostering long-term connections.
Contributing to a Competitive Advantage: In highly competitive markets, service quality can be a critical differentiator that sets an organization apart. When products and pricing are similar, customers are more likely to choose a brand known for exceptional service. High service quality becomes a distinguishing factor that attracts customers and enhances their loyalty. Organizations that focus on delivering consistent, high-quality service can establish themselves as industry leaders, building a reputation that attracts customers and retains them over the long term. By prioritizing service quality, organizations gain a competitive advantage that fuels customer satisfaction and growth.

Service quality is essential for customer satisfaction because it shapes every interaction, influences trust, and builds lasting relationships. By delivering high-quality service, organizations ensure that they meet and exceed customer expectations, creating positive experiences that leave lasting impressions. High service quality enhances customer satisfaction, fosters loyalty, reduces service recovery costs, encourages brand advocacy, and contributes to a strong competitive position. In today’s customer-driven market, prioritizing service quality is crucial for building a loyal customer base, sustaining growth, and securing a brand’s reputation. For any organization, investing in service quality is an investment in customer satisfaction and long-term success.

What Are the Key Dimensions of Service Quality in Service-Oriented Businesses?

Service quality is a critical factor for success in service-oriented businesses, as it directly influences customer satisfaction, loyalty, and the overall reputation of the business. Unlike product-based businesses, where tangible attributes can often measure quality, service quality is assessed through a combination of tangible and intangible factors that shape the customer’s experience. Several key dimensions have been identified as fundamental to evaluating and enhancing service quality. Here’s an in-depth look at these essential dimensions:

Tangibles: Tangibles refer to the physical aspects of the service experience, including the facilities, equipment, and appearance of personnel. While services are inherently intangible, tangibles give customers a concrete representation of the business’s quality.
- Examples: Cleanliness and organization of the environment, modern equipment, professional appearance of employees, and the quality of physical materials such as menus, brochures, or décor.
- Importance: Tangibles shape the first impression, which often influences the overall perception of service quality. In many cases, customers equate a visually appealing and well-maintained environment with attention to detail and high service quality.
Reliability: Reliability is the ability of the business to consistently deliver on promises and meet customer expectations. It encompasses the accuracy and dependability of the service, including everything from service delivery to accuracy in transactions.
- Examples: On-time service delivery, accurate billing, correct order fulfillment, dependable availability of resources, and consistency in quality across interactions.
- Importance: Reliability is one of the most critical dimensions, as customers expect a service to be dependable. When a business consistently fulfills its promises, it builds trust, reinforces customer loyalty, and enhances its reputation for reliability.
Responsiveness: Responsiveness reflects the willingness and readiness of staff to assist customers promptly and address their needs. Responsiveness involves not only the speed of service but also the approachability and attentiveness of the staff.
- Examples: Quick response to inquiries, minimal wait times, proactive assistance with issues, and staff availability.
- Importance: Customers value their time and appreciate prompt service, so responsiveness has a significant impact on satisfaction. When staff are attentive and efficient, customers feel valued, respected, and more likely to have a positive experience.
Assurance: Assurance is the competence, courtesy, and confidence displayed by staff that instills trust in customers. This dimension includes staff expertise, politeness, and the ability to make customers feel safe and respected.
- Examples: Knowledgeable employees who can answer questions accurately, courteous interactions, and the ability to handle complex requests confidently.
- Importance: Assurance is especially important in fields where customers rely on the expertise of staff, such as healthcare, finance, or consulting. When employees demonstrate professionalism and competence, customers feel secure in the quality of the service, which increases their trust and satisfaction.
Empathy: Empathy is the degree of care, individualized attention, and understanding shown to customers. It involves recognizing each customer’s unique needs and making them feel valued.
- Examples: Personalized service, remembering customer preferences, showing patience, accommodating specific needs, and friendly interactions.
- Importance: Empathy helps build an emotional connection between the business and the customer, enhancing satisfaction and loyalty. When customers feel understood and genuinely cared for, they are more likely to return and recommend the business to others.

These key dimensions—Tangibles, Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, and Empathy —are essential for understanding and enhancing service quality in service-oriented businesses. Each dimension captures a different facet of the customer experience, from the physical environment to the emotional connection formed through empathy and assurance. By consistently assessing and improving these dimensions, businesses can build trust, meet customer needs effectively, and cultivate lasting satisfaction and loyalty.

How Does Service Quality Impact Customer Loyalty and Retention?

Service quality has a profound impact on customer loyalty and retention, as it shapes the entire customer experience and defines how customers feel about continuing their relationship with a brand. When service quality is high, it builds trust by demonstrating consistency and reliability. Customers who receive dependable service know they can count on the business to deliver on its promises, making them more likely to return. Additionally, service quality helps meet and even exceed customer expectations. When a business consistently delivers value and surprises customers with exceptional service, it creates memorable experiences that foster loyalty. A satisfied customer is far more likely to stick with a brand, even in a competitive landscape, than one who has had an inconsistent or poor experience.

The emotional connection created by high-quality service also plays a crucial role in customer loyalty. Service quality goes beyond simply meeting functional needs; it includes empathy, attentiveness, and personalized care, which show customers that the brand values them as individuals. This emotional connection encourages customers to stay with the business even when there are minor setbacks or when other options are available. Additionally, high service quality leads to positive word-of-mouth. Satisfied customers often share their experiences with others, becoming advocates for the brand. This word-of-mouth marketing not only reinforces their own loyalty but also attracts new customers, helping the business grow organically.

Effective service quality also minimizes customer churn, as customers are less likely to leave when their needs are met or exceeded. On the other hand, poor service is one of the most common reasons customers seek alternatives. When service quality is prioritized, issues are addressed quickly, and service recovery becomes a part of the experience. Customers often forgive occasional problems if the business demonstrates a commitment to resolving them with care and urgency. This approach shows that the organization values its relationship with the customer, reinforcing loyalty even after a negative experience.

How Can Organizations Balance Cost Efficiency with High Service Quality?

Balancing cost efficiency with high service quality requires a strategic approach prioritizing resource optimization, effective use of technology, and a deep understanding of customer needs. Organizations can start by streamlining processes to reduce waste and improve speed without sacrificing quality. By regularly reviewing and refining workflows, companies can eliminate redundancies and create smoother, more efficient operations, which helps control costs while ensuring consistency in customer service.

Investing in employee training is another key component of balancing cost and quality. Skilled, well-trained employees can handle various tasks efficiently and provide high-quality service, reducing the need for constant supervision or rework. Cross-training employees to take on multiple roles, for example, allows for flexibility during peak times and ensures that service quality remains high even when resources are limited. Additionally, leveraging technology such as automation and self-service tools can significantly reduce labor costs and enhance service quality. Automating repetitive tasks or offering self-service options allows customers to perform basic functions independently, which reduces wait times and improves customer satisfaction while freeing employees to focus on more complex interactions.

Data-driven decision-making further supports this balance by helping organizations identify which aspects of service are most valued by customers and prioritize resources accordingly. Analyzing customer feedback and usage patterns enables businesses to focus on high-impact areas, ensuring that they invest in quality where it matters most. Additionally, proactive maintenance and service allow organizations to anticipate potential issues before they become costly problems, preserving both cost efficiency and customer experience.

Finally, fostering a customer-centric culture empowers employees to make thoughtful, on-the-spot decisions that improve service without excessive costs. When employees feel trusted to address customer needs directly, it reduces the need for escalations and extensive recovery efforts, maintaining satisfaction and controlling expenses. By combining process efficiency, targeted investments, and a focus on customer needs, organizations can achieve a balanced approach that delivers quality service while managing costs, resulting in loyal customers and sustainable growth.

What Are Common Challenges in Maintaining Consistent Service Quality?

Maintaining consistent service quality is essential for any business that wants to build trust, foster customer loyalty, and enhance its reputation. Consistency in service quality reassures customers that they can expect the same positive experience each time they engage with a business. However, achieving and sustaining this level of consistency can be challenging due to various operational, human, and technological factors. Here are some of the most common challenges organizations face regarding maintaining consistent service quality and how they can be addressed.

Variability in Human Performance: One of the biggest challenges in maintaining service consistency is the natural variability in human performance. Employees may have different skill levels, work ethics, and attitudes that impact how they deliver service on any given day. Additionally, factors like fatigue, stress, and personal issues can lead to fluctuations in an employee’s performance.
Solution: To address this, businesses can establish clear service standards and provide regular training to ensure all employees are aligned with the company’s expectations for quality. Implementing performance management and support systems helps keep employees motivated and consistent. By investing in skill development, businesses can help employees deliver quality service regardless of external circumstances.
Managing High Demand and Peak Periods: During peak times, such as holidays or special promotions, the increased volume of customers can put a strain on resources and staff. This pressure can lead to longer wait times, rushed interactions, and even errors—all of which can compromise service quality and lead to customer dissatisfaction.
Solution: Demand forecasting, flexible staffing, and cross-training employees to handle various roles can help organizations manage peak periods effectively. Additionally, using technology solutions like self-service kiosks or online chatbots can alleviate some of the pressure by enabling customers to access services independently.
Complexity of Service Offerings: Maintaining a consistent quality level across all services can be challenging in many businesses, especially those with diverse service offerings. Different services may require specific processes, knowledge, or expertise, making it harder to deliver uniform experiences.
Solution: Streamlining services and standardizing processes for each offering can help reduce complexity and improve consistency. Regular training sessions for staff to master specific services ensure that they are well-equipped to handle each offering. Specialized staff roles can also be effective in businesses where some services require unique skills or knowledge.
Communication Gaps Between Departments: In larger organizations or those with multiple departments, communication gaps can arise that affect service quality. When information isn’t effectively shared, or departments are not aligned on processes and expectations, it can lead to misunderstandings, service delays, and inconsistent experiences for customers.
Solution: Establishing clear communication protocols and using centralized communication platforms help departments stay informed and coordinated. Regular team meetings and cross-department briefings also foster better collaboration, ensuring that everyone is aligned on service expectations and can work together to resolve issues quickly.
Technology and System Failures: With technology playing an increasingly central role in service delivery, technical issues or system failures can disrupt service quality. Outdated technology, software glitches, or hardware malfunctions can lead to service delays, errors, and customer frustration.
Solution: Organizations can minimize these issues by investing in reliable technology and scheduling regular maintenance. Additionally, having a backup system or contingency plan ensures that service disruptions are minimized if technology fails. By prioritizing tech support and infrastructure updates, businesses can ensure consistent service delivery even in the event of minor technical issues.
Adapting to Changing Customer Expectations: Customer expectations are continually evolving, driven by advancements in technology, industry trends, and competitive offerings. Failure to keep up with these shifting expectations can lead to service experiences that feel outdated or irrelevant, resulting in customer dissatisfaction.
Solution: Regularly collecting customer feedback, staying aware of industry trends, and benchmarking against competitors can help organizations stay in tune with customer preferences. By using this information to adapt and refine services, businesses can meet evolving expectations and maintain a high level of customer satisfaction.
Quality Control Across Multiple Locations: Maintaining consistent quality can be a complex task for organizations with multiple branches or service locations. Variations in management styles, staff training, and local practices can lead to inconsistencies across different sites, which can confuse or frustrate customers who expect a uniform experience.
Solution: Standardizing training, service protocols, and quality benchmarks across locations helps ensure consistency. Additionally, conducting regular quality audits and sharing best practices across locations fosters a unified approach to service quality. Centralized management tools can also provide real-time oversight, helping monitor performance and address inconsistencies.
Employee Turnover and Retention Issues: High employee turnover can make it challenging to maintain consistent service quality, as new hires may take time to get up to speed with service standards. Frequent changes in staff can also disrupt team dynamics and service processes, resulting in gaps in customer experience.
Solution: Fostering a positive work environment, providing competitive compensation, and creating opportunities for career development help reduce turnover. Effective onboarding programs and ongoing training also ensure that new employees are well-prepared to deliver high-quality service. Building a culture that values service excellence and recognizes employee contributions can further encourage retention and consistency.
Balancing Cost Efficiency with Service Quality: Finding the right balance between cost control and high service quality is an ongoing challenge for many businesses. Budget constraints can limit the resources available for hiring, training, and maintaining quality standards, potentially compromising the customer experience.
Solution: To balance cost and quality, organizations can prioritize process efficiency, focus on high-impact areas of service, and use data to guide resource allocation. Leveraging automation for repetitive tasks, outsourcing non-core activities, and investing in preventive maintenance also help keep costs manageable without sacrificing quality.
Measuring and Monitoring Service Quality Effectively: Service quality can be difficult to measure due to its subjective nature, which makes it challenging to monitor consistently. Without effective measurement, it can be difficult to identify service quality issues or areas for improvement.
Solution: Using a combination of quantitative metrics (such as customer satisfaction scores and response times) and qualitative feedback from customers provides a more comprehensive view of service quality. Implementing performance metrics and regularly reviewing customer feedback enables organizations to identify emerging trends, detect problems early, and make adjustments to improve consistency.

Maintaining consistent service quality is a complex task influenced by various human, operational, and technological factors. By understanding and addressing these common challenges—such as employee variability, managing peak demand, ensuring communication, and keeping up with changing expectations—organizations can build a strong foundation for reliable, high-quality service. Through effective training, standardized processes, targeted investments in technology, and a customer-centric culture, businesses can deliver consistent experiences that foster loyalty, drive customer satisfaction, and support long-term success.

What Are the Most Widely Used Models and Frameworks for Measuring Service Quality?

Service quality is a crucial factor in building customer satisfaction and loyalty. It provides an organization with a competitive edge by ensuring that customers receive reliable, efficient, and delightful experiences. Measuring service quality, however, can be complex, as it involves both tangible and intangible elements. Organizations often rely on various models and frameworks to assess and improve service quality. Here are some of the most widely used models for measuring service quality and how they can help organizations deliver consistently high standards of service.

1. SERVQUAL Model

The SERVQUAL model, developed by Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry, is one of the most widely recognized frameworks for assessing service quality. This model is based on the concept that service quality can be measured by identifying gaps between customer expectations and their perceptions of actual service received.

Dimensions: SERVQUAL evaluates five dimensions—Tangibles (physical aspects of the service), Reliability (ability to provide dependable service), Responsiveness (promptness and willingness to help), Assurance (knowledge and courtesy of employees), and Empathy (individualized attention to customers).
Application: Organizations use SERVQUAL by conducting surveys that measure both customer expectations and perceptions across these dimensions. By analyzing the gaps between the two, businesses can identify areas for improvement and set goals to meet or exceed customer expectations. SERVQUAL is popular in industries such as hospitality, healthcare, and retail.

2. SERVPERF Model

The SERVPERF model is a simplified version of SERVQUAL, developed by Cronin and Taylor. Unlike SERVQUAL, which compares expectations and perceptions, SERVPERF focuses solely on service performance, suggesting that perceived performance alone is a sufficient indicator of service quality.

Dimensions: SERVPERF uses the same five dimensions as SERVQUAL—Tangibles, Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, and Empathy—but does not include the expectations component.
Application: SERVPERF is commonly used when organizations prefer a simpler, performance-based approach to service quality measurement. This model is popular in industries like retail, healthcare, and banking, where performance is a more straightforward indicator of service quality.

3. GAP Model of Service Quality

The GAP Model, also developed by Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry, is designed to identify specific “gaps” in the service process that may lead to discrepancies between customer expectations and perceived service.

Key Gaps:
1. Gap 1: Difference between customer expectations and management perceptions.
2. Gap 2: Difference between management perceptions and service quality specifications.
3. Gap 3: Difference between service quality specifications and service delivery.
4. Gap 4: Difference between service delivery and external communications.
5. Gap 5: Difference between expected service and perceived service (the focus of SERVQUAL).
Application: The GAP Model helps organizations identify specific areas where service delivery may fall short, allowing them to focus on closing these gaps. It is widely used in industries where customer satisfaction is heavily influenced by operational efficiency and clear communication, such as healthcare, hospitality, and financial services.

4. RATER Model

The RATER model is derived from the SERVQUAL framework and focuses on five dimensions that directly impact service quality. The model is named after its five dimensions: Reliability, Assurance, Tangibles, Empathy, and Responsiveness.

Application: The RATER model simplifies the approach to service quality by focusing on these core aspects, making it easier for employees and managers to remember and implement. It is particularly useful in training and development, helping staff understand the key drivers of customer satisfaction. This model is applied across many service-based industries and is often used in customer service training programs.

5. LibQUAL+®

LibQUAL+® is a specialized version of the SERVQUAL model, specifically designed for assessing service quality in libraries. Developed by the Association of Research Libraries, LibQUAL+® aims to measure user perceptions of library services and identify areas for improvement.

Dimensions: LibQUAL+® measures three main dimensions: Affect of Service (customer-staff interactions), Information Control (access to and availability of resources), and Library as Place (physical environment and ambiance).
Application: Academic and research libraries use LibQUAL+® to survey patrons, gathering feedback on their experiences and satisfaction. The model helps libraries assess whether they are meeting user needs and provides a framework for addressing any service gaps.

6. Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI)

The Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) provides a comprehensive measure of overall customer satisfaction by combining various factors such as perceived quality, customer expectations, and perceived value. It offers an aggregate score that reflects customers’ contentment with the organization’s offerings.

Application: CSI is used across a wide range of industries, providing a single, easily understandable score that represents customer satisfaction. This index is particularly useful for tracking changes over time, benchmarking against competitors, and understanding the overall effectiveness of an organization’s service efforts.

7. Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA)

Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) is a model that evaluates service quality by comparing the importance of specific service attributes to customers and the organization’s performance in delivering them. Attributes are plotted on a grid to identify areas where improvements can have the most impact on customer satisfaction.

Grid Quadrants:
1. High Importance, Low Performance: Focus here for improvement.
2. High Importance, High Performance: Maintain the quality.
3. Low Importance, Low Performance: Low priority.
4. Low Importance, High Performance: Possible overinvestment.
Application: IPA is often used to prioritize resource allocation, focusing on areas where improvement will have the most significant effect on customer satisfaction. It is commonly used in industries such as tourism, healthcare, and hospitality, where resource optimization is critical.

8. Kano Model

The Kano Model, developed by Professor Noriaki Kano, categorizes service attributes into different types based on their impact on customer satisfaction. It helps businesses understand which features are essential and which add unexpected value.

Categories:
1. Basic Needs: Must-have features that do not increase satisfaction but cause dissatisfaction if absent.
2. Performance Needs: Features that have a direct, proportional impact on satisfaction.
3. Excitement Needs: Unexpected features that can delight customers when present.
Application: The Kano Model is particularly useful in service and product design, allowing organizations to identify opportunities for differentiation and prioritize attributes that drive customer satisfaction.

9. Net Promoter Score (NPS)

The Net Promoter Score (NPS) is a widely used metric that measures customer loyalty by asking customers a single question: “How likely are you to recommend our service to others?” Customers are classified into Promoters, Passives, and Detractors.

Calculation: NPS is calculated by subtracting the percentage of Detractors from the percentage of Promoters.
Application: NPS is used across industries as a quick and reliable way to gauge customer loyalty and satisfaction. High NPS scores indicate strong customer satisfaction and brand loyalty, while low scores highlight areas needing improvement.

10. Critical Incident Technique (CIT)

The Critical Incident Technique (CIT) is a qualitative approach that involves gathering specific, detailed customer feedback about significant positive or negative experiences. CIT focuses on “critical incidents” that impact customer perceptions of service quality.

Application: CIT is commonly used to identify specific factors or behaviors that influence customer satisfaction or dissatisfaction. It is valuable in industries where personalized experiences are crucial, such as hospitality and healthcare, as it provides insights into the moments that matter most to customers.

Each of these models and frameworks—SERVQUAL, SERVPERF, GAP Model, RATER, LibQUAL+®, CSI, IPA, Kano Model, NPS, and CIT—offers a unique approach to measuring and improving service quality. Choosing the right model depends on the organization’s specific goals, industry, and the type of insights needed. By leveraging these models, organizations can systematically assess service quality, address gaps, and enhance the overall customer experience, leading to stronger customer satisfaction and loyalty. Whether focusing on customer expectations, performance, or satisfaction drivers, these frameworks provide valuable tools for organizations aiming to deliver consistent, high-quality service.

Reference Article:

Akbar, M. M., & Parvez, N. (2009). Impact of Service Quality, Trust, and Customer Satisfaction on Customers Loyalty. ABAC Journal, 29(1), Article 1. http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/abacjournal/article/view/526
Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (2004). Marketing Services: Competing Through Quality. Simon and Schuster.
Bitner, M. J., Zeithaml, V. A., & Gremler, D. D. (2010). Technology’s Impact on the Gaps Model of Service Quality. In P. P. Maglio, C. A. Kieliszewski, & J. C. Spohrer (Eds.), Handbook of Service Science (pp. 197–218). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1628-0_10
Casabianca, J. M., Junker, B. W., & Patz, R. J. (2016). Hierarchical Rater Models. In Handbook of Item Response Theory. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Developing an index for online customer satisfaction: Adaptation of American Customer Satisfaction Index. (2008). Expert Systems with Applications, 34(4), 3033–3042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.06.036
Ennew, C. T., & Binks, M. R. (1996). The Impact of Service Quality and Service Characteristics on Customer Retention: Small Businesses and their Banks in the UK. British Journal of Management, 7(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.1996.tb00116.x
Feng, M., Mangan, J., Wong, C., Xu, M., & Lalwani, C. (2014). Investigating the different approaches to importance–performance analysis. The Service Industries Journal, 34(12), 1021–1041. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2014.915949
Ghobadian, A., Speller, S., & Jones, M. (1994). Service Quality. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 11(9), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719410074297
Gupta, A., McDaniel, J. C., & Kanthi Herath, S. (2005). Quality management in service firms: Sustaining structures of total quality service. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 15(4), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520510606853
Idayati, I., Kesuma, I. M., Aprianto, R., & Suwarno, S. (2020). The Effect of Service Quality on Citizen’s Expectation through Dimension of Tangible, Emphaty, Reliability, Responsiveness and Assurance (TERRA). SRIWIJAYA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 241–252. https://doi.org/10.29259/sijdeb.v4i3.241-252
Izogo, E. E. (2017). Customer loyalty in telecom service sector: The role of service quality and customer commitment. The TQM Journal, 29(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-10-2014-0089
Johnston, R. (1995). The determinants of service quality: Satisfiers and dissatisfiers. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6(5), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239510101536
Južnik Rotar, L., & Kozar, M. (2017). Sciendo. Organizacija, 50(4), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1515/orga-2017-0025
Manaf, A. A., Zeki, A., Zamani, M., Chuprat, S., & El-Qawasmeh, E. (2011). Informatics Engineering and Information Science, Part II: International Conference, ICIEIS 2011, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, November 12-14, 2011. Proceedings, Part II. Springer.
Mandal, P. C. (2014). Net promoter score: A conceptual analysis. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 8(4), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMCP.2014.066899
Poll, R. (2003). MANAGING SERVICE QUALITY WITH THE BALANCED SCORECARD. In Advances in Library Administration and Organization (world; Vol. 20, pp. 213–227). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-0671(02)20010-3
Ranaweera, C., & Neely, A. (2003). Some moderating effects on the service quality‐customer retention link. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(2), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310458474
Service productivity and service quality: A necessary trade-off? (2012). International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 800–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.10.014
Seth, N., Deshmukh, S. G., & Vrat, P. (2005). Service quality models: A review. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(9), 913–949. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710510625211
Setó-Pamies, D. (2012). Customer loyalty to service providers: Examining the role of service quality, customer satisfaction and trust. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(11–12), 1257–1271. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2012.669551
Sutanto, S. (2023, July 14). Public Health Center Patient Satisfaction: The Role of Empathy, Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, and Tangibles. Proceedings of the 2nd Lekantara Annual Conference on Public Administration, Literature, Social Sciences, Humanities, and Education, LePALISSHE 2022, 29 October 2022, Malang, East Java, Indonesia. https://eudl.eu/doi/10.4108/eai.29-10-2022.2334031
Thompson, B., Cook, C., & Thompson, R. L. (2002). Reliability and Structure of LibQUAL+ Scores: Measuring Perceived Library Service Quality. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2(1), 3–12.
Viergever, R. F. (2019). The Critical Incident Technique: Method or Methodology? Qualitative Health Research, 29(7), 1065–1079. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318813112