How Misinformation Affects Public Trust in Media and Institutions

Misinformation profoundly impacts public trust in media and institutions, eroding confidence in their credibility and integrity. As false or misleading information spreads quickly through social media and other digital platforms, it can distort perceptions, create confusion, and amplify existing biases. When people encounter conflicting or deceptive narratives, they often become skeptical of traditional news outlets, government bodies, and other authoritative institutions, leading to a breakdown in trust. This erosion of trust not only weakens the ability of media and institutions to fulfill their roles in society but also fosters greater polarization and disengagement among the public. Understanding how misinformation affects public trust is crucial for addressing its harmful consequences and restoring the credibility of these essential pillars of society.

How Misinformation Affects Public Trust in Media and Institutions

Misinformation—the spread of false or misleading information, whether intentional or accidental—has far-reaching consequences for society. Among its most significant impacts is the erosion of public trust in media and institutions. Trust is a cornerstone of societal stability, enabling governments, news organizations, and other institutions to function effectively. When misinformation undermines this trust, it weakens the ability of these entities to serve the public, leading to confusion, polarization, and reduced civic engagement. Here’s a closer look at how misinformation affects public trust in media and institutions:

1. Undermining Credibility Through False Narratives: Misinformation often targets institutions and the media directly, spreading false narratives that question their credibility and motives. Claims of “fake news,” biased reporting, or institutional corruption can cause individuals to doubt the reliability of these entities, even when they are functioning ethically. For example, during election cycles, misinformation about media bias or government manipulation can lead to widespread skepticism about the fairness of electoral processes, diminishing public trust in the systems designed to ensure transparency and accountability.
2. Amplifying Perceived Bias: Misinformation exacerbates the perception of bias in media and institutions. By presenting exaggerated or fabricated examples of partiality, misinformation makes it appear as though institutions serve specific agendas rather than the public good. For instance, false claims that a news outlet intentionally misrepresents events or favors certain political parties can lead audiences to view all coverage as slanted, reducing their willingness to engage with factual reporting.
3. Creating Confusion and Doubt: The spread of conflicting or ambiguous information creates a sense of confusion and doubt among the public. When people encounter multiple versions of the same event or issue—some factual, others false—it becomes harder to discern the truth. This “information fog” can lead to a blanket skepticism where individuals distrust all sources equally, including reputable institutions and media outlets.
4. Promoting Conspiracy Theories: Misinformation often fuels conspiracy theories that directly challenge the legitimacy of media and institutions. These theories suggest that powerful groups or organizations are deliberately misleading the public, fostering a deep mistrust of authority. For example, conspiracy theories about global health organizations, such as claims that they profit from pandemics, can undermine trust in critical health guidance during crises. As conspiracy theories gain traction, they erode the ability of institutions to function effectively and serve the public interest.
5. Polarizing Public Opinion: Misinformation drives polarization by dividing individuals into opposing camps with deeply entrenched beliefs. Polarized groups often view media and institutions through the lens of their ideological biases, trusting only those that align with their views and distrusting others. This polarization reduces the perceived neutrality of institutions and fosters a belief that they are tools of one group or another, further fracturing societal trust.
6. Eroding Trust in Democratic Processes: Misinformation about democratic institutions, such as claims of election fraud or corruption, can have devastating effects on public trust. False narratives about the integrity of voting systems, for instance, have led to widespread skepticism about electoral outcomes. This distrust discourages civic participation, weakens faith in democratic processes, and fosters cynicism toward government agencies responsible for overseeing elections.
7. Weakening Responses to Public Crises: During public crises, such as health emergencies or natural disasters, misinformation undermines trust in institutions tasked with managing these events. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, false claims about vaccine safety and government overreach led to widespread resistance to public health measures. This distrust hampered the efforts of health organizations, governments, and scientific communities to provide effective solutions, ultimately prolonging the crisis and increasing its toll on society.
8. Spreading Through Social Media: While facilitating communication, social media platforms have also become major conduits for misinformation targeting media and institutions. Viral posts, memes, and manipulated videos often question the integrity of trusted entities, amplifying distrust. Algorithms prioritizing sensational or controversial content further exacerbate this issue, ensuring that misinformation spreads faster than corrections or verified information.
9. Damaging Long-Term Reputation: Repeated exposure to misinformation damages the long-term reputation of media and institutions. Even when specific false claims are debunked, the lingering effects of doubt and skepticism can persist. For example, repeated accusations of bias against a news outlet may lead audiences to question its impartiality, even if those accusations are unfounded. Over time, this erosion of trust reduces the effectiveness of these entities in informing the public or implementing policies.
10. Reducing Public Engagement and Compliance: When people distrust media and institutions, they are less likely to engage with or comply with their guidance. This can lead to reduced civic participation, such as lower voter turnout, or resistance to public policies, such as health mandates or environmental regulations. The perception that institutions are unreliable or self-serving discourages individuals from supporting collective efforts to address societal challenges.

Misinformation significantly undermines public trust in media and institutions by questioning their credibility, promoting perceived bias, and fostering confusion and doubt. This erosion of trust weakens societal cohesion, reduces compliance with policies, and hampers the ability of institutions to serve the public effectively. Addressing this issue requires a combination of efforts, including media literacy education, transparent communication, and proactive debunking of false narratives. Rebuilding trust is essential for ensuring that media and institutions can continue to play their vital roles in informing and supporting society.

Reference Articles:

1. Islam, Md. S., Mahmud, R., & Ahmed, B. (2023). Trust in Government during COVID-19 Pandemic in Bangladesh: An Analysis of Social Media Users’ Perception of Misinformation and Knowledge about Government Measures. International Journal of Public Administration, 46(8), 570–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.2004605
2. Koulolias, V., Jonathan, G. M., Fernandez, M., & Sotirchos, D. (2018). Combating Misinformation: An ecosystem in co-creation. OECD Publishing. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-156426
3. Lee, F. L. F. (2024). Disinformation Perceptions and Media Trust: The Moderating Roles of Political Trust and Values. International Journal of Communication, 18(0), Article 0.
4. Melki, J., Tamim, H., Hadid, D., Makki, M., Amine, J. E., & Hitti, E. (2021). Mitigating infodemics: The relationship between news exposure and trust and belief in COVID-19 fake news and social media spreading. PLOS ONE, 16(6), e0252830. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252830
5. Ognyanova, K., Lazer, D., Robertson, R. E., & Wilson, C. (2020). Misinformation in action: Fake news exposure is linked to lower trust in media, higher trust in government when your side is in power. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-024
6. Park, Y. J., Chung, J. E., & Kim, J. N. (2022). Social media, misinformation, and cultivation of informational mistrust: Cultivating Covid-19 mistrust. Journalism, 23(12), 2571–2590. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221085050
7. Rucinska, S., Fecko, M., & Mital, O. (2023). Trust in public institutions in the age of disinformation. Proceedings of the Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2023, 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1145/3603304.3604075
8. Social media trust: Fighting misinformation in the time of crisis. (2024). International Journal of Information Management, 77, 102780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102780
9. Štětka, V., Brandao, F., Mihelj, S., Tóth, F., Hallin, D., Rothberg, D., Ferracioli, P., & Klimkiewicz, B. (n.d.). Have people ‘had enough of experts’? The impact of populism and pandemic misinformation on institutional trust in comparative perspective. Information, Communication & Society, 0(0), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2413121
10. Stubenvoll, M., Heiss, R., & Matthes, J. (2021). Media Trust Under Threat: Antecedents and Consequences of Misinformation Perceptions on Social Media. International Journal of Communication, 15(0), Article 0.